Table 1 |
|||||
|
Comparison between ABACAS and CONTIGuator performances over the four test genomes. |
|||||
|
B. microti |
Y. enterocolitica |
L. lactis |
S. meliloti |
||
|
|
|||||
|
bp Mapped |
CONTIGuator |
3291978 |
4164667 |
1912883 |
6350458 |
|
ABACAS |
3256036 |
3876600 |
1803685 |
5754197 |
|
|
PGA4genomics |
3267649 |
3090612 |
1761837 |
6897232 |
|
|
OSlay |
3286027 |
4236992 |
2020582 |
6906017 |
|
|
Projector2 |
3271308 |
3160370 |
1661752 |
262344 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
PCR pairs |
CONTIGuator |
61 |
304 |
89 |
73 |
|
ABACAS |
49 |
255 |
78 |
62 |
|
|
Projector2 |
71 |
278 |
367 |
20 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Gaps putatively closed |
CONTIGuator |
58 |
171 |
63 |
39 |
|
ABACAS |
42 |
158 |
56 |
35 |
|
|
Projector2 |
64 |
90 |
323 |
4 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
The base pairs derived from those contigs appearing in more than one replicon were divided by two. |
|||||
|
Galardini et al. Source Code for Biology and Medicine 2011 6:11 doi:10.1186/1751-0473-6-11 |
|||||
